Alabama State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,177  Arion Span FR 22:45
2,428  Tatiana Etienne SR 23:03
2,546  Janice Lane JR 23:14
2,968  Shakalia Williams SR 24:09
2,974  Sade Lavallias JR 24:10
2,986  Hayley Spears JR 24:12
3,114  Brandee Ebert SR 24:35
3,150  Shakailia Williams JR 24:42
3,204  Chyna-Joi Staton FR 24:55
3,363  Markia Bartley SR 25:46
3,476  Kleo Torres FR 26:49
National Rank #290 of 344
South Region Rank #36 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 38th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Arion Span Tatiana Etienne Janice Lane Shakalia Williams Sade Lavallias Hayley Spears Brandee Ebert Shakailia Williams Chyna-Joi Staton Markia Bartley Kleo Torres
Commadore Classic 09/17 1436 22:57 22:43 23:40 24:41 24:23 24:34 24:47 25:58
FSU Invitational 10/07 1428 22:43 24:19 22:57 24:26 23:57 24:05 24:28 25:20 27:09
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1399 22:38 23:10 23:15 25:00 24:19 23:44 25:01 25:03 25:35 26:36
SWAC Championships 10/21 1420 22:59 22:39 23:13 24:25 24:49 24:28 24:42 24:30 26:41
South Region Championships 11/11 1399 22:32 23:23 23:12 24:01 23:55 24:11 25:29





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 37.5 1106



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Arion Span 184.9
Tatiana Etienne 207.1
Janice Lane 216.7
Shakalia Williams 252.6
Sade Lavallias 253.5
Hayley Spears 254.6
Brandee Ebert 264.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 0.1% 0.1 32
33 0.6% 0.6 33
34 3.2% 3.2 34
35 7.9% 7.9 35
36 11.5% 11.5 36
37 19.5% 19.5 37
38 32.2% 32.2 38
39 20.1% 20.1 39
40 5.2% 5.2 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0